Conservapedia is a much-needed alternative to Wikipedia, which is increasingly anti-Christian and anti-American.
So finally here it is: Conservapedia!
(”There is no page titled “zappa”. You can create this page. “)
Conservapedia
March 5th, 2007 • Balint
10 Responses to “Conservapedia”
Fun Diversions
Zappa Related
- Arf Dot Ru
- Arf Society
- Balint’s Zappa In Hungary
- Bogus Pomp
- Chrome Dinette
- Crush All Boxes
- David Ocker’s Mixed Meters
- FredUnzel
- FZ Lyrics
- Here Comes The Flood
- Jazzappa
- Lamarr Bruister
- Naurin’s FZ Shows
- Planet Of My Dreams
- Planet Zappa
- Planeta Zappa
- Project/Object
- The Grande Mothers
- The Idiot Bastard
- The Scott Thunes Effect
- Ugly Radio Rebellion
- United Mutations
- Zappa In France
- Zappa In Germany
- Zappa In Holland
- Zappa In Sweden
- Zappa Internet Jam
- Zappa Patio
- Zappa Scrapbook
- ZappaLinks.co.uk
- Zone Luco
March 5th, 2007 at 3:30 pm »
a co-worker pointed out that there is no page titled “contraceptive” either. strange…
March 5th, 2007 at 3:46 pm »
Ohmyohmyohmy…. what a find.
On the page Examples of Bias in Wikipedia they’ve made a fine collection of bias themselves.
Also: where is it stated that Wikipedia is or should be an American-only medium? That’s right, cower before the existance of different viewpoints!
I was also hard pressed at finding any page on conservapedia that doesn’t mention wikipedia at all.
March 5th, 2007 at 4:17 pm »
As usual the fun hides in the Talk pages… Oh, and they do have a page on homosexuality!
March 5th, 2007 at 4:52 pm »
Nothing on mk Ultra or Freemasons.
March 5th, 2007 at 4:56 pm »
and it doesn’t stop there
Personally, I like reading up what the world is really all about on Uncyclopedia
March 5th, 2007 at 6:46 pm »
Ideology filters knowledge. Looking for facts & figures to prove their right. Always been that way.
Basic line ( and thus major point for discussion ) is: the content of the history books in high school.
March 6th, 2007 at 7:24 am »
Fun for the whole traditional family-unit!
Anyone wanna start up a “Torquemada” page … or an “Iran-Contra” page … or a “Halliburton” page … or a “Tammy Faye Baker” page?
Or fer that matter, can ANY entity in the known multiverse kindly tell me just what the flaming frack ” A CONSERVATIVE ENCYCLOPEDIA YOU CAN TRUST” actually IS?!
Phew, it’s the paradoxical pong of Eau d’Oxymoron!
Quick, Ethyl - The Flit!
March 6th, 2007 at 7:45 am »
Funny that Frank called himself a ‘conservative’. He was always ahead of his time. The American Republican party is not conservative in any coherent sense, any American sense of the word, and that’s becoming very clear to a lot of people in the ‘States at the moment (not just rabid individuals like me!). The Democrats are the conservatives AND the liberals now. ‘Conservative’ is not the same as ‘authoritarian’ (’watch the Nazis run your town’).
What ‘conservative’ means depends on what you’re trying to conserve, which would vary depending on what country you’re in. Frank liked parts of the US constitution (the Bill of Rights) and wanted to conserve them. That kind of conservatism is starting to make a comeback, thank god.
March 6th, 2007 at 7:57 am »
Uhh … & they really do have a debate entitled:
“Crusades…Good or Bad?”
Yeah, no guff mcduff … & the “Good” team looks like it’s kicking butt.
Holy fuck.
March 7th, 2007 at 12:46 am »
A visual conservative encyclopedia — a mouth sewn shut, eyes glued closed, ears plugged with ideas you already believe!