BossK has taken the Zappa Patio offline, leaving FZ-fans without the invaluable bootleg discography it provided. Says the editor: “I apologize for taking it offline but it WILL BE BACK” (although no longer maintained by him). (Hat tip: SOFA)
October 26th, 2004 • Barry's Imaginary Publisher
BossK has taken the Zappa Patio offline, leaving FZ-fans without the invaluable bootleg discography it provided. Says the editor: “I apologize for taking it offline but it WILL BE BACK” (although no longer maintained by him). (Hat tip: SOFA)
This entry was posted on Tuesday, October 26th, 2004 at 9:22 am by Barry's Imaginary Publisher and is filed under Frank Zappa, Zappa Misc. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Hello and Welcome to the Fine Print!
killuglyradio.com is a community partly dedicated to Frank Zappa. We are non-profit and not in any way endorsed or connected with The Zappa Family Trust and/or Zappa.com. The Zappa Family Trust and Dweezil Zappa have no formal or informal association and in no way condone or support our efforts to further enhance knowledge of and appreciation of the many and vast talents of Frank Zappa. Any content related to FZ is nothing more than a fan's efforts to broaden the knowledge and appreciation of the many works of Frank Zappa. As such, any Zappa related content exists solely as an educational tool to help achieve that goal. Lest ye forget: lawyers are the scum of the earth. You might want to remember that.Credits & Miscellany
WordPress is what's under the hood
October 26th, 2004 at 4:01 pm »
Hey, no!!!!! One of the best pages!!!! I hpoe it will be back soon, I visited it regularly…
October 26th, 2004 at 7:32 pm »
Hope for a swift return - it’s a goldmine.
October 27th, 2004 at 10:12 pm »
Thanks to WinHTTrack I got a complete offline copy of the site last May, about 14Mb (10 Mb zipped). Perhaps I will make it available when the site doesn’t return soon… Those interested can message me on the forum and I’ll see what I can do later on this year, but remember, let’s give BossK some time to sort things out!
October 27th, 2004 at 10:35 pm »
Putting the existing stuff back online wouldn’t be so hard — maintaining it, keeping it up to date however is a whole ‘nuther can of worms…
October 27th, 2004 at 11:47 pm »
Just to clarify things: too many great sites went down, most of them with the promise to be back online soon, but most never return. That’s why I keep an offline copy of sites I value most. It’s up to the original webmaster to keep things online or to take it down, and there’s always the option to keep things online without updating. And you’re right, a reference site should be online AND maintained but in most cases such a site is the effort of one devoted guy/girl with too little time and money.
Perhaps a valuable site should be maintained by a a group of devotees, rather than a single individual. And maybe there should be some kind of graveyard repository of redundant/orphaned sites that nobody whishes to maintain, just to keep the info available, rather than losing it. This reminds me, I’ve got a site floating in cyberspace that hasn’t been updated of at least 3 years…mea culpa
October 28th, 2004 at 9:46 am »
Ah and whereabouts on the internets may we find this morsel of cyberspace?
Actually the thought had crossed my mind to build something similar to ZP (the nerve! I know!) but make it a collaborative effort based on MediaWiki’s software. Not sure as of yet if I’ll pull trough with it though.
I should also mention that a certain other FZ-related website *cough* is preparing to revive some of those graveyard goodies you mentioned.