Illegal Art
Should artists be allowed to use copyrighted materials? Where do the First Amendment and “intellectual property” law collide? What is art’s future if the current laws are allowed to stand?
Should artists be allowed to use copyrighted materials? Where do the First Amendment and “intellectual property” law collide? What is art’s future if the current laws are allowed to stand?
Hello and Welcome to the Fine Print!
killuglyradio.com is a community partly dedicated to Frank Zappa. We are non-profit and not in any way endorsed or connected with The Zappa Family Trust and/or Zappa.com. The Zappa Family Trust and Dweezil Zappa have no formal or informal association and in no way condone or support our efforts to further enhance knowledge of and appreciation of the many and vast talents of Frank Zappa. Any content related to FZ is nothing more than a fan's efforts to broaden the knowledge and appreciation of the many works of Frank Zappa. As such, any Zappa related content exists solely as an educational tool to help achieve that goal. Lest ye forget: lawyers are the scum of the earth. You might want to remember that.
Credits & Miscellany
This weblog is powered by WordPress.
Dreamhost is our webhost of choice.
Design & content © 2013 killuglyradio.com except where noted.
KUR cannot be held responsible for comments submitted by any of its readers.
RSS feeds: Entries | Comments
Feel free to contact us at killuglyradio@gmail.com
October 28th, 2003 at 11:19 pm »
there’s definitely a line somewhere. its a tough call. i think its definitely cool if its for an installation piece or something on a limited scale. when it comes to mass-production, or making huge sums of money, it should either not be done, or a share of the profits should be diverted to the originator of the work. (much like the non-artist p. diddy, and his incessant use of samples)