Comments on: The 256 vs. 128 kbps Debate http://www.killuglyradio.com/hot-poop/2007/04/10/the-256-vs-128-kbps-debate Frank Zappa news, weird links, lumpy gravy. Wanna bun? Sat, 22 Nov 2008 15:44:34 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: Ryan http://www.killuglyradio.com/hot-poop/2007/04/10/the-256-vs-128-kbps-debate#comment-12398 Ryan Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:17:29 +0000 http://www.killuglyradio.com/hot-poop/2007/04/10/the-256-vs-128-kbps-debate#comment-12398 Wouldn't you automatically get the highest quality of audio if you just buy the disk? Wouldn’t you automatically get the highest quality of audio if you just buy the disk?

]]> By: m3tafung http://www.killuglyradio.com/hot-poop/2007/04/10/the-256-vs-128-kbps-debate#comment-12397 m3tafung Tue, 10 Apr 2007 22:39:16 +0000 http://www.killuglyradio.com/hot-poop/2007/04/10/the-256-vs-128-kbps-debate#comment-12397 The first time I heard anything off of Joe's Garage was back when Napster was still free. I downloaded Why Does it Hurt..., Joe's Garage, and Lucielle... When I bought the full album I was suprised to hear alot of little nuances were not audible in the Mp3s. Some of those songs are highly layered like Joe's Garage which adds more instrumentation almost every verse. It was almost like hearing totally new songs. Lucielle went from being boring to very relaxing and beautiful. Since that point I have stuck with CDs. The first time I heard anything off of Joe’s Garage was back when Napster was still free. I downloaded Why Does it Hurt…, Joe’s Garage, and Lucielle… When I bought the full album I was suprised to hear alot of little nuances were not audible in the Mp3s. Some of those songs are highly layered like Joe’s Garage which adds more instrumentation almost every verse. It was almost like hearing totally new songs. Lucielle went from being boring to very relaxing and beautiful.

Since that point I have stuck with CDs.

]]> By: Wannabeard http://www.killuglyradio.com/hot-poop/2007/04/10/the-256-vs-128-kbps-debate#comment-12393 Wannabeard Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:49:00 +0000 http://www.killuglyradio.com/hot-poop/2007/04/10/the-256-vs-128-kbps-debate#comment-12393 Well, I guess most of the people frequenting this site are more or less used to listen to music in a not-so-lossless audio format. And after all, in the old days, some people complained when recordings went from Shellac to vinyl, because you didn't have to concentrate to listen to the record anymore, and so people wouldn't really be paying attention to what they were listening to. So I think I will get along without the higher audio quality. You know, I haven't been buying the 24k gold cds either, although I have been thinking about the OSFA. Well, I guess most of the people frequenting this site are more or less used to listen to music in a not-so-lossless audio format.
And after all, in the old days, some people complained when recordings went from Shellac to vinyl, because you didn’t have to concentrate to listen to the record anymore, and so people wouldn’t really be paying attention to what they were listening to.
So I think I will get along without the higher audio quality. You know, I haven’t been buying the 24k gold cds either, although I have been thinking about the OSFA.

]]> By: urbangraffito http://www.killuglyradio.com/hot-poop/2007/04/10/the-256-vs-128-kbps-debate#comment-12389 urbangraffito Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:58:20 +0000 http://www.killuglyradio.com/hot-poop/2007/04/10/the-256-vs-128-kbps-debate#comment-12389 Sounds a lot like a negative marketing paradigm to me, Barry. Then, again, I am one of those who refuse to lease music like software from the likes of iTunes et al, so I avoid the whole 256 vs. 128 kbps debate. To those that do...happy downloading...kaching! Sounds a lot like a negative marketing paradigm to me, Barry. Then, again, I am one of those who refuse to lease music like software from the likes of iTunes et al, so I avoid the whole 256 vs. 128 kbps debate. To those that do…happy downloading…kaching!

]]>