Rockers and their propagation of the number 666. I wonder what number “Christian rockers” claim… 777?
December 13th, 2002 • Barry's Imaginary Publisher
Rockers and their propagation of the number 666. I wonder what number “Christian rockers” claim… 777?
This entry was posted on Friday, December 13th, 2002 at 2:32 pm by Barry's Imaginary Publisher and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Hello and Welcome to the Fine Print!
killuglyradio.com is a community partly dedicated to Frank Zappa. We are non-profit and not in any way endorsed or connected with The Zappa Family Trust and/or Zappa.com. The Zappa Family Trust and Dweezil Zappa have no formal or informal association and in no way condone or support our efforts to further enhance knowledge of and appreciation of the many and vast talents of Frank Zappa. Any content related to FZ is nothing more than a fan's efforts to broaden the knowledge and appreciation of the many works of Frank Zappa. As such, any Zappa related content exists solely as an educational tool to help achieve that goal. Lest ye forget: lawyers are the scum of the earth. You might want to remember that.Credits & Miscellany
WordPress is what's under the hood
December 13th, 2002 at 2:36 pm »
If the devil is 6 then God is 7
December 13th, 2002 at 6:56 pm »
Pixies!
December 14th, 2002 at 4:08 pm »
777 is used by Mr. Stevie Vai himself. Quoting Jimi Hendrix, “Now, if six turned out to be nine - I don’t mind.”
December 14th, 2002 at 11:06 pm »
667 the neighbour of the beast
December 15th, 2002 at 12:25 pm »
999: the beast doing a handstand.
December 16th, 2002 at 10:51 am »
I don’t know that the “ghost in the machine” cover being mirrored reveals much other than the perverse mind of the person who would stick an album cover in front of a mirror.
Are these people obsessed with reverse masking ?
terrible slur on that Mr Sting, “a very nice man”
(he used to cut my grass).
December 16th, 2002 at 4:48 pm »
Ironically, this entry has 6 comments. Erh, well make that 7…